C.P.C. RAFHAN LIMITED versus PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 199 Constitutional Application Valuation of Value by State Land Sales Authorization Authority Applicable Authority Applicable Authority agreed to sell the property to the lenders, but never made any promise of value. , Which had not yet been determined by the competent authority and notified the applicant, the authorized authority had fixed the price of the property but the applicant price fixed by the authorized authority had not been accepted by the seller. Was not accepted. It cannot be said by the petitioner that the State was ever willing to sell the property at any particular price and the State had violated the Promise Claims Act by not selling the applicant at that price. Was not bound by any rules. , The principle of fair play, equity of promise space, to convey the property to the applicant, the appealed applicant wanted to offer the applicant a price which was not agreed to by the competent authority at a fixed price and had no right No, the state had in its power to change the decision to sell the property to the applicant through a private contract. An order to bring a better competitive price can dictate the sale through an open auction petitioner, who is the property lender and always wants to buy the property in question, the High Court observed, in the situation where the applicant was the highest bidder. Was not going to happen. At auction held by the authorities, then auction approval for the price offered by the highest bidder
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
