Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD FAYYAZ versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Ss: 302 (a) & 302 (b) definition of evidence, reduction of convicted complaints was neither related to the deceased nor by any enmity with the accused falsely implicated in the commission of fines. Was killed. The possibility of bad luck was ruled out at a very short distance. The record also did not allege that he should be tried for the original culprit, which was a rare case in which the eyewitnesses, including the complainant, were present. The person who witnessed the incident and they confirmed each other in relation to the salient features of the incident. Ocular testimony was confirmed by medical evidence, it was alleged that the statements of eyewitnesses to kill the deceased were proved, the report considered the recovery of the pistol or the incident. The crime recovered from the place was matched with the pistol recovered from the blanks. The accused was not charged with any defamation, the investigating officer to send the recovered articles to the expert late, nor the defense having the weapon of offense when it was the Presiding Officer of the Sessions Court and the Special Court. I was accused of being vacant. The trial judge had the power of trial even though otherwise, no objection was taken at the trial court's jurisdictional trial and no prejudice was imposed on the accused, the prosecution and the defense. Both suppressed the real facts. Regarding the incident, however, something must have happened between the parties that forced the accused to work with the deceased family advocate from Khuzdar lawyer