LJAZ AHMAD versus D.R.O.
Section 14 (d) Conan testimony (10 of 1984), Article 11 Election The credibility of the candidate's general credibility video recording depends on the returning officer's videotape showing the candidate being a participant in the dance party in which He was. The dancing girl is pouring money, neither was the person presented to the video recording officer, nor was an affidavit made by the person, such video by the returning officer Isolation and nomination of the candidate were seen by the film officer. Was rejected on the basis of such evidence. The Waldetti video film was not a piece of legal evidence and could not be relied upon by the returning officer, so the order passed by the officer was not based on any evidence. The High Court set aside this order. Rejection of applicant's nomination in case of Returning Officer
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Karore Lalisan lawyer