Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

NATIONAL INVESTMENT TRUST LTD. versus SAMI ULLAH


Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 212 (3) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 2A General Clauses Act (X of 1897), Section 6 (c) Settlement of liabilities after the retirement of voluntary separation scheme of public servants. Per Thi was an employee of the Ministry of Finance and was later selected as an Officer Grade III in the National Investment Trust Voluntary Separation Scheme, which was presented by the Trust to its employees, and the public servant contracted with the federal government for the same period of public employment. Service was accepted. The retirement scheme was not included in the Ministry of Finance for the purpose of retirement and liability settlement, according to the Tribunal. On appeal, the duration of service as a public servant in the Ministry of Finance should be included in the service of a public servant. Had applied for his appointment through the appropriate channel and there was no interruption in his service, which was entitled to the benefits of service on voluntary retirement was also governed by a civil servant. y Vol 6 Volunteer Separation Scheme for the Computation of Section 6 (c) of the General Clauses Act, 1897 - Term of Service for Acquisition of Settlement Obligations Under Acceptance of the Tribunal's Authorization - OK to arrive at the end, with the permission of a civil servant Was. Appeals and tribunal decisions did not involve any inherent weakness or judicial wrongdoing involving public workers iii Legal costs at public expense, instead of being fair and reasonable with public servants, the public court should be fair, fair and fair. Should work with equality, the Supreme Court rejects the appeal for appeal

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for advocates from Mandi Faizabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.