AMJAD ALI versus BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION
12 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art, 212 (3) Failure to provide ad-hoc adjournment adjournment hearing, dismissing candidates from the Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education; Appointed on an ad hoc basis and their services were terminated before the expiry of the inspection period, the constitutional applications filed by the applicants were rejected by the High Court. The applicants were told that their services. They were not provided with a hearing before termination. This was not necessary in the circumstances of the applicants as they were terminated in accordance with the terms and conditions contained in the letter of appointment and also accepted by the applicants where the terms and conditions of the appointment letter were sought, Applicants could not object. The same applicants could not object to the termination of the applicants. They were not appointed on a regular basis. The ad hoc appointment was for a fixed term only and the appointee had no right to claim continuity in the service and Appointments are not allowed to appeal any right to challenge the termination of their service. Was denied
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
