Find a Lawyer

MEHAR JAN versus GUL AZAM

Civil Code of Conduct 1908 Section 115 The dispute between the two courts regarding the possession of suit land under dispute by two courts under existing Shamlat Diyah, both parties held that the plaintiff had possession and The defendants were not. Failed to identify any material about a legitimate defense from a tribe so that they were concerned that they belonged to the tribes that had a right in the land and the Deputy Commissioner had given them a piece of land. No fragment was thus denied by the High Court of Shimla. Under the review, the conclusions of the two courts were dismissed in the circumstances how to become a advocate from Gharo lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes