ARIF MASIH versus THE STATE
The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 (b) / 34 evidence was examined in the complainant's house during the day when all the family members of the deceased including the deceased's wife submitted the explanation to the complainant. The features, which he repeated in court testimony, were assigned to the relevant roles played by the accused during the identification parade, which was confirmed by the magistrate who conducted the identification of the prosecution witnesses. Had given. In this case, there was no enmity to falsely implicate the accused. The ocular testimony was convincing and credible, the conviction of the perpetrators of the crime was upheld when the accused was found guilty.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Bisham lawyer
