Find a Lawyer

KOHINOOR TEXTILES MILLS LTD. versus CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, ISLAMABAD

Capital of the Republic (Determination of Territory) Ordinance 1963 Section 2 and Schedule Capital Development Authority Ordinance (XXII of 1960), Section 2 (P), 22 and the Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 99 Controversial application of capital territory, acquisition According to a notification issued by the Applicants Authority's Containment under the Capital Development Authority Ordinance, section 22 of 1960, the incorporation of the applicant's proprietary land in the capital area according to the notification issued by the Applicants Authority. Did not come to a specific area so the notification was illegal and without legal authority The Capital Capital Ordinance, section 2 of the 1963 Capital Territory Ordinance, was allocated a legitimate area of capital, the Capital Development Authority Ordinance, did not make similar changes in 1960, both reflecting the limits of the arrangement. The capital site and the specific areas but the schedule given by the Republic (the default area) ordinance 1963, the Capital Development Ordinance 1960 were to change the schedule. In order to determine the territorial limits of the capital, the schedule given by the Capital Republic Ordinance, 1963, had to be after the incorporation of land. The applicant's ownership in the Capital Territory was invalid as no restrictions were imposed and the Capital Development Authority's certificate itself indicated that the notification issued by the authorities regarding the applicant's land. The legal outcome came and the situation was kept the same list of supreme court advocates from Jhudo lawyer