MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus PARAMOUNT EXPORTS
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 An applicant's rehabilitation application claimed that he was employed as a sewing machine operator on a regular basis, but his services were terminated orally and without assigning any reason. The company denied the applicant's claim that the applicant was never in service. There was no question of the company issuing a dismissal order, but other than the applicant's oral statement that he was a permanent employee under the company, no further evidence was in the record to substantiate the applicant's claim. Only then can he file an application for his appointment. Nor can he furnish a copy of the appointment order, which has failed to prove that he was ever employed in the service of the company; the complaint filed by the applicant was rightly dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Upper Dir lawyer
