Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

NOOR HASSAN AWAN versus MUHAMMAD ASHRAF


Article 188 Supreme Court Rules, 1980, AXXVI The grounds for exclusion of the Supreme Court decision during the conditional argument were not excluded The grounds for review were not expressly excluded in the review application And was created during. Such misleading cannot be ignored or condoned during the argument as the same lead changed the request for review and turned the application into a fact that the appeal for leave was evident on appeal. Or there was no face to the decision - a provision for the provision of the crucial aspect of the review in which the court had neither failed to consider certain important aspects nor had it neglected any explicit request for review on the matter. In which, the case of Abdul Ghaffar Abdul Rahman and others v. Asghar Ali and others targeted the Supreme Court's principles. had gone. PLD 1998 SC 363, application dismissed

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best law firm from Qalandarabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.