Find a Lawyer

JAMIL MASIH versus STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Bail, Grant of Illegal Incident, two witnesses to the prosecution knew the accused, but they named their names in their statements. One of the men did not say, he saw that he had not recovered from the crime scene, leaving the accused, who was suspected to have killed the victim, had acknowledged the commission of the crime. And it recovered 12 bore shotguns. It was only suspected that the accused was part of a conspiracy that was apprehended by the co-accused who had actually killed the victim and that the accused was involved in the matter as interim, but no one on the record of the accused or the conspirator There was no direct evidence. Who was the landlord and the accused in regard to the house rent All material available on record against the accused was merely based on suspicion and hearing and his co-accused wife was not present at the time of the incident and his other relative was the accused. The last rite was in another village to attend, in which case they were guaranteed. top civil advocates from Kohlu lawyer