Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MAJEEDAN versus MUHAMMAD NASEEM


Section 9 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 115 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The plaintiff's dismissal by force without law was dismissed approximately 27 years ago, and the matter. It was pending before. Prior to the High Court's dismissal on the hypertensive issues, the trial court upheld the decision of the case and the review. No unlawful or weakening was committed by either the trial court or the reviewing court - review was justified in a particular case. It is possible that a clear misunderstanding of the legal position was resolved, or where there was an error in the jurisdiction, however, no unusual situation was brought to light and only one dispute was raised that questioned the fact. Had to search on. Not based on appropriate evidence or was false, intervention will not be justified, turning a review request into an appeal would be against it. The jurisdiction of Section 9 of the Special Relief Act, 1877, because it was expressly rejected by the law

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocate from Piplan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.