Find a Lawyer

ANOUD POWER GENERATION LIMITED versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Customs Act 1969 Section 19 Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990), Section 13 (1) Notification No. SRO 279 (1) / 94 Dated 2 4 1994 and SRO 584 (1) / 95 Date 1 7 1995 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 25 and 185 () Sales tax and customs duty, exemption from notification of Government of exemption No. SRO 279 (1) / 94, dated 2 4 1994, certain machinery and equipment Sales tax and customs Another notice exempted from payment of duty was no SRO 584 (1) / 95 dated 1 7 1995, subsequently issued by the authorities under which the immunity was withdrawn from the High Court under the jurisdiction under which I was discovered by those who After the launch of Campaign default notification No. SRO 584 (1) Letter of credit were opened. / 95, dated 1 7 1995, and the bills filed were not entitled to the benefits of the original notification number SRO 279 (1) / 94, dated 2-4 1994, because the importer was in equal condition to the importer. The letter of credit and entry bills were filed before the amendment, which did not meet the unconstitutional notification and hockey terms that importers had been treated as being discriminated against and the authorities had There was no jurisdiction to withdraw or revoke a pre-approved waiver and the notification was issued once. Despite the fact that the situation was changing and it was not possible for his government to extend the benefit of duty waivers to the importers who had not yet planned or planned to do so. In both sets of companies, it was appropriate to do so under the new conditions after the date of the revised notification rating. online advocate from More kunda lawyer