Find a Lawyer

BAKSHISH versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Section 5 of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964, Schedule 14 and Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The petitioner (wife) in the trial and remand for the rehabilitation of the constitutional plea granted restitution to himself and his son. Sued for while restitution of marital rights (husband) The trial court ruled that the wife's jurisdiction, but the son's allowance was upheld in the appeal but the husband's suit for the restoration of marital rights was denied, appellant. The wife also challenged the court's decision. The constitutional petition claims that the appellate court below has not properly appreciated the evidence on record, the High Court may begin to examine the evidence on record. Only the appellate court should examine the evidence of justification. Notwithstanding the High Court's failure to exercise its constitutional jurisdiction, the finding of any record of irregularity or legal jurisdiction in the judgment passed by the Appellate C, below us, is a finding of fact recorded by it. The exercise of its constitutional jurisdiction cannot be interfered with by the High Court. ask a advocate free from Patoki lawyer