Find a Lawyer

RAB DINO versus S.D.M.

Sections 110/55 and 561 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) abolish an action = In his report, the allegations against the accused by Section H were not only ambiguous, but the general record did not say that the accused was habitual. Was a thief according to the Or he retained stolen property and damaged bandits or was publicly a terrorist who was allegedly lodged under the S5A of the Gambling Act against the accused, which had nothing to do with section 1110. , A CCPC station house officer, described himself as a witness. His report against the accused before the magistrate hearing is equivalent to abusing the law and accordingly he has been terminated. family advocate from Bagh lawyer