MUHAMMAD NAWAZ KHAN versus MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, MULTAN
Rule of Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973 R 6 (3) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Failure to present evidence of failure of significant fines in civil service R 6 (3) of public servants Under the Showcase Notice (Eligibility and Discipline) Rules, 1973, the employee was issued, for the first time and after such a summary procedure, he was charged with a mandatory retirement penalty, where the employee made all the charges. Denied, it was not the case that this should be avoided. In fact due to the disputed questions involved the shortest procedure for showcase notices which could not be resolved without proof of cross inspection and record information from a public servant. The employees' case was dealt with by the authorities against the principles and guidelines given by the Supreme. The court and such case were illegal and without any legal authority the High Court directed the authorities to initiate proceedings with the employee from the stage of appointment of the inquiry officer under the punishment imposed by the employee on the employee. Will proceed according to the law, he was separated under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Dudial lawyer