Find a Lawyer

HUSSAIN ABDULLAH SALUM versus THE STATE

Section 156 (1) (8) of the Customs Act 1969, Drug Control Act (XXV of 1997), Sections 6, 7, 9, 72 and 74 of Pakistan (1973), Article 13 (a) Code of Criminal Procedure (V of 1898) )), After being convicted and sentenced under section 156 (1) (8) of the Section 403 Customs Act, 1969, the accused was protected against double punishment, and for that reason he was given the Narcotic Substance Act, 1997 He was also convicted under Section 9 of the IPC. Under the Narcotic Substances Act 1997, under section 72 and 74, all laws are subject to trial under the special law mentioned above, and the trial or sentencing offense by the customs court was non-judgmental, therefore, Article 13 (a) Protection of the Constitution or of section 403, CCP was not applicable, the offense was committed by the accused before the enactment of the Narcotic Material Stances Control Act 1997, as was not the case at the time of the commission. Under the Crime and Punishment Customs Act, 1969 and the Control of the Narcotic Substance Act, 1997, both the accused were already sent back to their country after conviction under the Customs Act, 1969, and in the specific circumstances of this case there was no illegal Was not a thing Such action may be attributed to the appeal accordingly [Disappeared by Xavier Morea and another v. 2000 state PCRL J 956] us immigration advocates from Dadakhel lawyer