Find a Lawyer

AZIZ ULLAH KHAN versus S.H.O., POLICE STATION CITY, MIANWALI

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/324/379/411 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 173 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition The High Court had directed the Section HO to submit the challan to the accused court. ? According to its conclusions, the District Attorney's report shows that the offense was proved under Section 302, PPC, but at the same time, the police had said that under Section 322, PPC. The offense has been committed and the invoice should have been presented under the District Attorney under Section 73 District Court, the CCP was empowered to present the challan before the court, and they were obliged to carefully state the statements. And, at the time of trial, the documents presented by the prosecution also complete the investigation of the nature of the crime by the accused district attorney. Was qualified professionals and have the legal right to change it at the ticket office. nce who according to his opinion had earlier committed the error, if any wrongdoing was mentioned by the police in the challan, however, the nature of the crime could not be ruled out and the challan could be presented in court. ? The District Attorney was not obliged to locate the police and, as a legal expert, had the authority to decide the nature of the crime and to select a court to present the challan, the constitutional plea directed the district attorney Was deleted with Present to the Challan Sessions Court, who will decide when the charge is made, the relevant provisions of the Code of Conduct. law websites from Nowshero Feroz lawyer