STATE versus RIAZ AHMED
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 (5) Contempt Code (XLV of 1860), FIR 364/34 FIR was adequately defined in the filing of bail The parties knew each other and the accused The motive for the commission of the crime was mentioned in the name FIR so far the kidnapper had not been recovered and the sessions court did not give proper attention to this aspect of the case while granting pre-arrest bail to the accused. In-depth review, which was not a guarantee of law at the bail stage, took the unfair advantage of pre-arrest bail at the trial and was not included in the police investigation. Was given, but the obstacles were created by the accused complained that a party was being threatened serious consequences, and they did not even challenge. Not only was the undesirable order of the proceedings made in the bail application against him by any respondent affirmative, it was unreasonable and unreasonable but the arrest granted to the accused before the arrest was canceled.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Karore Lalisan lawyer