SHAUKAT versus MST. SHAMAS RAFIQ
Section 21 The raising of new petitions to guide the evidence of the increase in appeal, the tenant, in the appeal against the dismissal order, was denied the existence of the landlord and tenant relationship, the new stand in the appeal, the rent. The dispute on the part of the clerk was the opportunity to present evidence to the rent controller. Such a new application can be justified where the appellate process raises additional questions about fact and law, the appellate court may, in an appropriate case, direct that evidence be led. Going because no party offered by the tenant will be prejudiced. Before the controller of the party could not allow the party to blow hot and cold, it experimented with various facts at different stages to allow the parties to do so and the sanctity of the judicial system was damaged.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Lakimarwat lawyer