DIL BAGH HUSSAIN versus THE STATE
Sections 302, 306 (c), 308 (2) and 309 (2) of the sentence, the accused's property killed his son, who was a minor son by marriage and his son was the heir of the deceased and the widow. Because the accused's daughter was a direct descendant of the accused, therefore, according to Section 306 (c), the PPC was not responsible for the death of the accused, but he was responsible for paying the dues. Was sentenced to 14 years in prison. As described under Section 308 (2), the PPC widow waived her right to murder without any compensation, but the victim's minor son, whose rights to the defendant could not be waived, was charged under section 302. Diat was entitled to his share in the death sentence. As a result of the PPC, the deceased's minor son was altered to pay diat and he was also sentenced to fourteen years in prison as a punishment.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Kurram Agency lawyer
