Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ALAM versus ALI SHER

Suit for the right of forcible provisions of sections 4, 15 and 21 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913 before the two courts in this case ruled that the possession of the property was pre-occupied because of the property. Is a high right and that the shop owners do not own. Can't resist the state suit Three of the four shopkeepers acquired the land by inheritance during the suit's death on their father's death and became the owner of the estate, and the fourth also inherited the land on his father's death. Was obtained. All the participants of the Final Appeal had become property owners on the pre-trial proceedings before the trial court and the appellate court, and they had obtained the right to the first case of the plaintiff, before the present emperor's decision could not succeed. And the orders passed by the two courts below were set aside and the case filed by the plaintiffs was dropped. top civil advocates from Kot Radha Kishan lawyer