IRSHAD AHMED MIRZA versus MUMTAZ APPARELS (PVT.) LTD.
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 51 Retention of Complaint Payment Complaints Employee appreciation services were terminated without verbal reasons of the employee, the employee claimed the liability under which he complained of the employee. Had failed to resolve the matter, it had filed a complaint. The plea before the Labor Court, which was rejected on the ground that the Labor Court has no jurisdiction in this matter, and the employee filed his case under the Commissioner for Wages Act, 1936, under which the employer in the establishment The employee was being charged as a maintenance operator. The duties of manual labor, in praise of the \ laborer, were, in the circumstances, rightly requested Section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, for payment of dues.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
