Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

DEWAN SYED MUHAMMAD SULTAN AHMAD ALIAS DEWAN SYED GHULAM ABBAS versus THE STATE


West Pakistan Land Reforms Regulation 1959 West Pakistan Land Reforms Regulation, 1959, Para 7 (2) Sale of land Some part of the price paid before the imposition of martial law but the supply of occupancy is not established nor is the property of the tenants in possession. Aware of the change, verification of sales completed prior to martial law was rightly rejected

P L D 1966 W. P. (Rev.) 11

Before I. U. Khan, Chief Land Commissioner, West Pakistan

Dewan Syed MUHAMMAD SULTAN AHMAD

alias Dewan Syed GHULAM ABBAS‑Appellant

versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Appeal No. 306 of 1958‑59, decided on 11th August 1959.

West Pakistan Land Reforms Regulation, 1959,

para. 7(2) Sale of land‑Part of sale price paid before imposition of Martial Law but delivery of possession not established nor tenants informed about change of ownership‑Transaction, held, not completed before imposition of Martial Law‑Validation of sale rightly rejected.

Khalifa Mumtaz Hussain for Appellant.

ORDER

This order will dispose of the following two appeals:‑----

(1) Dewan Syed Muhammad Sultan Ahmad alias Dewan Syed Ghulam Abbas v. State (306).

(2) Dewan Syed Muhammad Sultan Ahmad alias Dewan Syed Ghulam Abbas v. State (307).

These two appeals have been filed against orders dated the 11th of June 1959, passed by the Land Commissioner, Multan, whereby he refused to validate the oral sale of the land in question made by the appellant in favour of Ghulam Sarwar, etc.

The facts of the case are that the appellant moved for the validation of the sale mentioned above. The Land Commissioner found that the Patwari made a report in his Roznamcha Waqiati on 3rd January 1959, and the mutation is still pending. Hence these two appeals.

I have heard the learned counsel for the appellant. He has shown me some documents to show that the part of the sale price was paid in instalments before the imposition of the Martial Law. There was no evidence to establish that the delivery of possession took place before the imposition of the Martial Law or the tenants were informed about the change of ownership. It is, therefore, clear that the transaction was not complete before the imposition of the Martial Law. The validation was, therefore, rightly rejected. No interference is called for. Both the appeals fail and are rejected hereby.

S. Q. Appeal rejected.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of advocates from Khangah Sharif lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.