Find a Lawyer

GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB versus HUDABIA TEXTILES MILLS

Government Lands (Punjab) Colonization Act 1912 Sections 7 & 24 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII Of 1967), Sections 163 And 164 Pakistan (Administration Of Homeland Property) Act (XII Of 1957), Section 25 (2) (s) Land The Acquisition Act (of 1894) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) was granted leave of appeal to consider the question of whether the Colony Assistant, who passed the Rehabilitation Order, had been granted Was not empowered at the relevant time under Section 24? Under the Government Land (Punjab) Act, 1912, the order to resume and resume the land in dispute was without jurisdiction, whether in the Board of Revenue West Pakistan's notification number 140 70/282 CV Revenue, 23 Something existed in the history of December 23, 1970. Either way, to suggest that the effect of this was given to the Colony Assistant under section 24 of the powers under the Government Land Colonization (Punjab) Act, 1912, by notification number 6463/4271 CVI, dated 21.10 1963. Had to lose options. Pakistan is in pursuance of the powers conferred under section 3 of this Act issued by the W Government. Whether in the presence of appropriate legal remedies available through review, appeal and revision provided by Sections 11 & and 164 of the West Pakistan Lands Revenue Act 1967, read with section 7 of the Government Lands (Punjab) Colonization Act, 1912, the High Court Was the right use. Its constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution; whether the Governor is in his or her sole discretion to order the possession of the land in dispute after the withdrawal before its general transfer to the company and whether the plaintiff Income from vacancies, including land approved property advocate from Makli lawyer