Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

HAIDER KHAN versus MUSTAREEN


Clauses 3 and 4 of the Provincially Administered Tribal Areas Civil Code (Special Provisions) Regulations 1975 and Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 185 Constitutional Jurisdiction High Court Procedures (Special Provisions) Regulation, 1975, against the applicant. The matter was decided and the High Court did not interfere with the misrepresentation of evidence nor its constitutional jurisdiction in the Supreme Court nor in the Supreme Court in considering the material evidence. The special tribunals recorded the discovery of this fact unless there was a clear misrepresentation of the evidence or any failure by them to keep any other material available on the record, with the intervention of the Supreme Court of this kind. No weakness was felt.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Sanghar lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.