Find a Lawyer

SYED ZIA UL HASSAN GILANI versus MIAN KHADIM HUSSAIN AND 7 OTHERS

Section 5 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 20 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Family Court, Suit for the Juvenile Rehabilitation Allowance, Two separate permanent residence in residential premises after divorce Was. The suit was filed for care of the suit where her parents are located and her and my daughters are in custody in connection with her education in K I and the lower appellate court. The decision was made in favor of the plaintiff's appeal against the order. Was rejected under the provisions of Section 20 of the Validatiy plaintiff, may file a case under both the CPC as well as the temporary residence because of the proceedings at their temporary residence, the temporary residence of the minor will be considered. The action of the plaintiff in favor of the minor as guardian of the minor in the place where he resided shall not permanently affect the jurisdiction of the K Family Court at the temporary residence of his daughters (s). The plaintiff may request jurisdiction at his or her place or in both the courts to dispose of the care on their behalf. We were able to entertain the case slowly, with jurisdiction where the plaintiff resided at the place where I and the minor were in custody after the dissolution of the marriage, in which case the cause of action arose in their favor. And under the law they will have a common place of residence. Where I filed the case I was not guilty of the Family Court's territorial jurisdiction indicating any misinterpretation or non-reading of the plaintiff's decision and order. immigration advocates email from Alipur lawyer