Find a Lawyer

SYED SUBTAIN HUSSAIN KAZMI versus SYED TASAWAR HUSSAIN SHAH

Against the order of the Applicant Department as the Appellant Applicants before the respondents of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal Act 1975 Section 4 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Sections 42 and 47 Service Tribunal Pro. The service is filed before the Tribunal in which the applicant was enforced as the respondent, as the pro forma, the decision was made on the basis of the agreement between the respondents and consequently the respondents were referred to the other respondents. Was declared senior to the person who did not challenge the order not entitled to any relief Was found to be an attempt to enforce the applicants before an Appeal Tribunal, claiming that the provisions of the Civil Procedure Code apply to proceedings before the Service Tribunal. I can be moved to the Appellant Service Tribunal row after she found out that the applicant is not a pharma respondent as a applicant. The order, he was not entitled to any relief even though he enjoyed the powers of the civil court, but that would not mean that all provisions contained in the Civil Procedure Code, regardless of the basic provisions of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal Act, 1975 Without this, the service will apply to the proceedings before the Tribunal. It has been considered that an appeal by an aggrieved public servant to a service tribunal was made only after termination of departmental remedies within the prescribed time limit, though, except for the condition mentioned in the above act, Cannot be transferred as Appellant to Pharma Respondents advocate for immigration from Makran lawyer