Find a Lawyer

CHUTTAL KHAN versus THE STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 497 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 161, 409, 420, 468, 471, 171, 477A and 34 Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) Bail, the grant of the charges against the accused was that he had received some money because it was illegally pleading that there was some favor with the accused. The accused's name was not present in the FIR. And the only allegation made in the FIR was that some police officers also took bribes from the concerned. The officer accused of being a senior police officer was not related to the department's affairs in which the alleged misconduct in the stock was committed by senior officers and had not yet been established if the accused had committed the crime. If the accused is responsible, then the two accused have the evidence. Only the sanction of the accused and the witness of the prosecutor did not have any valid basis to believe that the accused was guilty of the offense charged. This requires further litigation. Upon inquiry, he was released on bail tax advocates from Risalpur lawyer