Find a Lawyer

GHULAM HAIDER versus MUHAMMAD AYUB

Amendment to the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 O VI, R 17 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The trial court heard the motion to change the suit of the plaintiff to the proposed amendment in the appeal phase During the course of the appeal, the respondent appealed for the amendment of the written statement during the trial. The appeal court dismissed the appeal and, at the same time, the respondent's stand that it received the request for amendment. At any stage, requests for amendments may be called. An application for modification of requests can be obtained at any stage of the proceedings, but the modification cannot be allowed to change the color of the case as requested by the respondent. It was earlier filed during the trial and the plaintiff who successfully set up his case will have to re-establish his case on suit property after the trial court presented evidence in support of the case. Following the approval of this amendment, the trial court should be given a trial court's request that the amendment may not be allowed. By obtaining an injunction from the trial court, which was up to the High Court phase, A VI, R 17 CPC, was equivalent to defrauding the opposition; That what was sought will deprive the plaintiff of the affirmative action in his favor jobs for advocates from Noorpur nooranga lawyer