AMJAD ALI versus BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION
12 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Failure to provide opportunity for a hearing on the termination of ad hoc appointment, dismissal of the Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education, Faisalabad Employees (Service) Regulations The candidates were appointed on optional grounds and their services were terminated before the deadline expired. The constitutional petition filed by the petitioners was dismissed by the High Court. Before terminating his services, he was not given any opportunity to be heard in which the applicants were given a hearing. The circumstances were not necessary as the terms of employment were removed in their appointment letters and the applicants also accepted them where the terms and conditions of the appointment letter were sought. Could not object. The same applicant cannot object to his termination; he was not appointed on a regular basis. The ad hoc appointment against a post was for a fixed term only and the appointee did not have the right to claim continuity in service. And the appointees did not take the right to challenge their termination act. Appeal denied
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
