MUHAMMAD ASHIQ versus MUHAMMAD USMAN
In section 135 and 164 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967, the division of the Land Revision Revenue Officer accepted the words of the defendant in the absence of the applicant, who was a co-participant in the land in the dispute, the Revenue Courts also required the law. Were strictly adhered to. If the applicants who were on the ground were deliberately absent or otherwise, the Revenue Officer was obliged to comply with the provisions of the law, taking into account all aspects of the taxation such as property acquisition. The obligation is to own each partner. Prior to the distribution scheme, the classification of the land of any part of the area near the settlement village, the absence of the participant in the distribution process cannot in any way exclude the Revenue Officer from the duty order which he has placed. Under the Additional Commissioner was allowed the land on the basis of the Vandas suggested by his distributing respondents, the law was bad and the case was remanded for further judgment.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Islamabad lawyer