Find a Lawyer

MAQBOOL AHMED BHATTI versus ZEESHAN AHMED BHATTI AND ANOTHER

The Code of Civil Procedure 1908 section 115 and O XX, R 15, failed to verify the approval of the dissolution accounts of the partnership firm based on the statement of the other plaintiff in a defendant's mineral liability account approval case. And the trial court was directed to verify the accounts. The accounts statement was described. The trial was accepted by a trial court on the basis of a statement in which the final order was not passed against both the defendants, an appeal was filed which was dismissed by the appellate court. The point was that accepting the statement of the other defendant's account could not be construed as a decree against it. Justification The following two courts have committed illegal and irregularities in reaching their respective conclusions against the defendant. Both the courts did not comply with the provisions of the law and relied on M. without regard to the legality and validity of the inquiry and the fact that the defendant's statement / admissions were not entertained. The same thing can be admitted and relied on for the purpose of prosecuting. And not against the other defendant being liable to pay the sum of money to the plaintiff where the plaintiff failed to present the case before the trial when the defendant is liable to pay any compensation from his part, judgment and The orders were not valid in any of the following courts and cannot be sustained. The High Court amended the decision of the courts below and decided against this defendant. jobs for advocates from Shangla lawyer