Find a Lawyer

RAHAT ALI versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 55A / & 34 & 5 365/34 ????? Definition of evidence of kidnapping for ransom which accused accused of creating fear, terror and insecurity in public, Special Court Anti-Terrorism Created under section (b) of the Act, 1997, the jurisdiction in this case correctly acknowledged that abduction with or without the demand for ransom was an act of terrorism itself. He was charged with causing the pped kidnapped child to recover, requiring private witnesses to join the recovery process and witness the recovery. There was no explanation. The twelve-hour delay was sufficiently explained in the FIR entry. Even, otherwise, in the presence of other authoritative evidence related to the crime of the accused, the delay in filing the FIR was ignored. It may be, the defense plea of hostility between certain property parties was not set on record, the opinion of the investigating officer can hardly be reached in court. There were other obvious reasons for arriving at another conclusion based on the material that was placed, because the file contains None of the accused's ransom was sought, they were acquitted on the charge. Section 365 A / 34; PPC prosecution, however, proved beyond doubt that the accused had abducted the minor and consequently sentenced him under Section 5 3634/34, PPC. Was sentenced to seven years in prison. lawer from fb area from Bhalwal lawyer