The reasons for the acquittal by the trial panel for acquittal of the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302 and 308 of the Criminal Procedure Code (V 1898), Section 417 (2A) were shocking and absurd, and they misrepresent the evidence. Based on which the prosecution faces prejudice. The complainant's mother, the mother of the case, was a natural witness of the incident and was given a very natural account of the incident that had long been inconsistent in crossing, but the trial court dismissed it as a misconception of the law. He was fired for the job. Very close and already known to the complainant, there was no question of any kind of misconduct or replacement of the accused, which in itself was a rare occurrence when the defendant filed a complaint with the complainant. The statement did not question how he identified the suspect. The dark prosecution has, thus, proved its case against the suspects beyond the shadow of a doubt, the accused proved on record near the honeybee, married the victim, and a daughter was born in the marriage. As a result, he was not declared to be acquitted and the accused was sentenced under Section 308, PPC and under the circumstances, RI was sentenced to 14 years.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
