Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM KHAN versus THE STATE

Witnesses testifying in honor of the honor of violating Article 302 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Arts 8 (1) and 9 Fundamental Rights were credible and had no intention of making false accusations against the accused and their Relationships with the deceased's alone cannot invalidate their testimony. A serious and sudden provocative defense request was made to drag the prosecutor's version during the tire trial. Nobody had any rights, nor could anyone be allowed to take the law into his own hands. In the name of honor kill someone. Neither the law nor religion allowed the killing of lawless people, which is like murderous simplicity. Such abusive and malicious act is a violation of the fundamental right as enshrined in Article 9 of the Constitution which states that a person shall be deprived of life and liberty in accordance with the law and in this regard any custom or The use was dismissed under Article 8 (1), saying that the purpose of the Constitution is not directly against those who die, the request for encroachment cannot be considered a mitigating case in this regard, the High Court said. By a reasonable decision, the accused had affirmed the sentencing death sentence, the appeal was rejected by the Supreme Court in the circumstances. famous lower court advocate from Kurram Agency lawyer