Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

S.M. GHARIB NAWAZ, DACCAWALA versus SINDH BAR COUNCIL


Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act 1973 Section 62 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) by the Supreme Court Counsel seeking exemption from the Benevolent Fund on the basis that the Supreme Court Counsel is responsible for contributing to this fund / scheme. Are not. Provincial Bar Council established in its respective provinces through Advocate of High Court and Subordinate Courts High Court Jurisdiction Advocate did not cease to be a High Court Advocate on his admission with Pakistan Bar Council as Supreme Court Counsel. Was. Participation in the privileged fund set up by the Provincial Bar Council will not qualify for waiver and, thus, it may not be appropriate for a lawyer to practice before the High Court, but for their welfare benefit fund. Will be refused to contribute to. Lawyers will not demand legal or moral justification on the grounds that the Advocate has registered himself as the Advocate of the Supreme Court.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
us immigration advocates from Loralai lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.