Find a Lawyer

MST. SIDDIQAN AFZAL AND 6 OTHERS versus ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND LAND CUSTOMS, FAISALABAD AND 2 OTHERS

Cause Notice under Sections 168, 180 and 221 (1) of the Customs Act 1969, Section 167 (81) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of Section 168 (2) of the Constitution Application Customs Act, 1969 Show in order to give such notice within the legal period, under section 167 (81) of the C Customs Act, 1878 C Customs Act, 1878, in possession of gold in the interest of the applicants in the year 1963 seized from the gold predecessor. Was taken out and banned in 1969. A new law was enacted, the authorities issued show cause notices on forcible arrest under the new law, Customs Act, 1969, 1978, and passed the order to seize gold and along with appeals before the authority. The government was also dismissed for legitimate confiscation. This gold will be deemed to be a violation of the Customs Act, 1878 and the customs act, section 221 (1) of the Customs Act, 1969. The effect of cancellation was made under the and the Regulation Act (Customs Act, 1969). As for the press, the confiscated authorities had to be disposed of under Sections 180 and 168 of the Customs Act 1969, where no notice was issued under Section 168 (2) of the Customs Act, 1969, after their approval, the authorities confiscated 'S orders were not sustainable. Were illegal in law and without any legal authority advocate for immigration from Chak Sawara lawyer