Find a Lawyer

HAJI MUHAMMAD AYUB KHAN AFRIDI versus THE SPECIAL APPELLATE COURT, PESHAWAR AND 3 OTHERS

As per the requirements of Section 31 of the Smuggling Act 1977 and 33 of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Constitution Request for Smuggling Act 1977 was recorded by the courts regarding the preliminary inquiry before issuing the notice. Before issuing the notice to the accused in connection with any illegal or fragile trial, the alleged material was thoroughly scrutinized and considered, leading to reasonable suspicion that The properties listed in the notice were obtained through smuggling assets The accused deliberately refused to appear before the trial court because he had no explanation for the possession of the large properties and was under section 33 of the said act. Were obliged to prove that the property mentioned in the notice was acquired by them in a legitimate way, so the law was always a guardian The accused is not in favor of AR, therefore, the arbitrators were not entitled to any relief under the extraordinary company's illegal powers of the High Court against the decisions granted under the special law classification. Cannot sit and no real dispute court is allowed in the Constitution Petition against the accused under the Prevention of Smuggling Act, the power of the former provisional laws cannot be questioned since 1977. Was rejected under the circumstances immigration advocates contact from Mehar lawyer