ABDUL RASHID versus SULEMAN
The Special Relief Act 1877 Section 9 suit defendants alleged that defendants violated their land and expelled them from their land The trial court dismissed the case, but the appellate court on record Based on the evidence, the judgment in which the plaintiff had verbally submitted, as well as documentary evidence such as jamabandi and measles on record, was that he was the owner of the suit land and the defendants surrendered to the said land. Was expelled from the ground in presenting any evidence to refute defendant's oral and documentary position. Were working. On the evidence of the plaintiff it was proved that the plaintiffs had been occupying their respective land for years, in which case, the appellate court had properly settled the trial court's decision and decision of the appellate court. The evidence on record cannot be interfered with
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Tando Mohd Khan lawyer
