Find a Lawyer

AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR versus ASHFAQUE AHMAD HASHMI

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants Act 1976 Section 22 Termination of Service Jobs Government employees' termination of employment of government employees on the recommendations of the Higher Authorization Committee of the Government Employees has been made under consideration of the legal status of various appointments of public servants. Was. Under the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants Act 1976, the government was not authorized to appoint any person without the recommendation of public servants. He was appointed without the commission's recommendation, his services were terminated without his service due to a violation of the law, under Wright's jurisdiction, the High Court upheld the dismissal order That the dismissal order was approved without giving show cause notice to the government employees. Without any legal authority it was condemned that the government did not authorize an individual to be exempted from appearing before the Public Employment Commission, which was obliged to terminate the services of a public servant who was employed by the public servants. The commission was set up without the recommendation of the services even if it had been terminated earlier. Without issuing or hearing a showcase notice, such legal error could not justify the appointment of a public servant who was himself unlawful. In this case, the employee was not, in these circumstances, entitled to a show cause notice prior to his dismissal. Along with such other citizens, the terminated civil servant could not request any discrimination in his case. The Supreme Court accepted the appeal and vacated the High Court verdict female advocates from Sajawal lawyer