Find a Lawyer

ALLAH DITTA versus SAEED AHMAD

CCC's withdrawal of civil procedure code Order XXIII and the adjustment of suit AXXIII, R 3, section 96 (3) and 100 suits were filed on the basis of a settlement agreement. Not properly represented before the trial court, and that the defendants are illiterate, there was not a fair opportunity to understand the import of the settlement which had adversely affected their rights; none other than the two defendants. Neither had challenged the settlement by filing an appeal and had not been challenged by them before. The trial court, which recorded the settlement, the two defendants represented by their lawyer had accepted the settlement. The court made its statements in the presence of their lawyer before deciding the matter on the basis of the settlement. , Other defendants who did not take advantage of non-representation, who did not even choose to challenge the agreement, were other defendants, some of whom were minor and were represented by sponsored advertisement who would otherwise I did not challenge the settlement, they were merely pharma supporters whose share was not in dispute. Nor were they the essential parties that were minors at the time, since they had become an older company. After the settlement, the defendants did not challenge the agreement, their appeal was heard. Was excluded as how to become a advocate from Rangoo lawyer