RABIA BIBI versus AYESHA SULTANA
The Property Act 1882 Section 122 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 164 gift, affirmed the applicant's allegation that the gift dead was a fake document that could not be included in the Revenue Record due to the donor. It could not remove 23 kanals of land from 20 kanals of land. And that work was not owned by the real estate owner because of the non-fulfillment of the gift deadline, because the Revenue Authority was not able to terminate the registration process and the responsibility of not working in the custody of the tax Applicants can meet with those who dispute the authenticity of the gift work. Member of the Review, seeking a declaration on the basis of the aforementioned point before the Board of Revenue, civil court, to prove that the fraudulent possession of the gift deed document cannot be imposed on a fraudulent gift. The condition was not valid for verification if it was not in all cases because the donor did not have it at the time of the release of the gift or for any other reason, but the donor did everything he could to lose the gifted property. Could not offer non-delivery possession as a gift
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Haripur lawyer