Find a Lawyer

SHAHZAD IQBAL versus FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

Pakistan Citizenship Rules 1952 R 23 Notification, Establishment Division OM No 2/2/67 DV Dated 26 8 1968 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Certificate of Residence as Domicile Petitioner with Domicile of the Father For his next senior position, his hometown \ R Exper was appointed as an experimental officer Petitioner, because it was not considered by the Authority that the applicant's father's hometown was \ Q in another province. Was followed and in the establishment Division OM No. 2/2 / 67DV, dated 26 8 1968, petitioner's Domicile Stewart The list was validated, and such applicants could not apply for the post of Punjab quota. There is no allegation that the domicile certificate was wrongly issued to the applicant, it will be presumed that the certificate was issued after compliance with the conditions of the applicants internally in IR23 of Pakistan Citizenship Rules, 1952. Born in place R born, completed his education there, was appointed and was performing his duty at the place, but was prevented from applying for the position. ? The Punjab quota, because the applicant's father had obtained a domicile in the different province act of the authority, under which the applicant was denied the opportunity to be appointed against the Punjab quota without legal authority. Was without jurisdiction under the circumstances. property advocates from Havelian lawyer