DOST MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE
Control of Drugs Act 1997 Section 9 (c) Criminal Code (v. 1898), Section 103 of the Definition of Evidence Section 103, CCP had no application for drug cases under his control. The accused did not deny the recovery. His statement is listed under Section 404040 (?), PC Police did not have the ability to plant large quantities of marijuana inside the house. Could not be excluded due to It is alleged that he belonged to his police department and it was alleged that he was changing his defense version which could not be relied upon. Chemical analysis of the material recovered from the accused's possession was proved and the accused. The conviction was upheld.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Kamokey lawyer
