MST. AZIMA AND ANOTHER versus THE STATE
Control of the Narcotic Sub Metals Act 1997 Section 9 (c) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (V1898), Section 342 of 342, the remand of the CCP case was not strictly followed by the provisions of Section 342 of the accused. According to the trial court did not examine. The CRPC certificates attached to the statements of the accused were not in writing by the Presiding Officer who appeared to sign four documents without recording the statements in accordance with the law, thus recording the statements of the accused under CRPC There was an error. There is no irregularity but an illegal one which was not curable. In this case, the misunderstanding of justice was expressed, the conviction and sentence of the accused were set aside and the accused's statements under Case 5 342 were recorded. He was remanded to the trial court for trial. Writing the appropriate decision as per the CCP and the law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Jamrud Road lawyer
