Section 2302 (b) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), section 1601, convicted one of the convicted defendants, was sentenced to death, while the other was sentenced to life imprisonment. The defendant's confession statement, if considered, showed one of the accused present on the spot and did not participate in any crime. Moreover, no role was assigned to and to the extent of the joint intent, and the trial court had sentenced the accused to life imprisonment with such consideration, which was not sufficiently sufficient to prove the general intent. Inspirational evidence was needed but no serious effort was made. Offer litigation to link the accused to a partner charge through litigation. For example, no action by the accused in a joint intention offer was proved that the participant was with the accused. There was no record in the record of the intention of the Joint unless the strong case was made available by the demonstration of the joint intention, the High Court did not present a separate case. Both the accused were tried and convicted by the trial court and they were acquitted of the charges which were allowed under the circumstances.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
