SHAKIL ASGHAR versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION, NAUSHEHRA, DISTRICT KHUSHAB
Motion Pictures Ordinance 1979 Sections 18 and 8 (5) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 14 Constitution Petition for Privacy Right to FIR was alleged that he was allegedly watching a blue film in a room. When they were surprised by a raiding party. The local police raid was carried out by the Assistant Sub Inspector Police and not by the Inspector that any advance information in this regard was either by the censor board or by a competent person or even by the District Magistrate. Therefore, watching such an offensive film in violation of the essential provisions of Section 8 (5) of the Motion Picture Ordinance, 1979, was not attracted by the provisions of section 18 of the Motion Picture Ordinance 1979. Displaying a film completely separate activity Although the investigation into this matter has been completed, there was a confession or complaint in this regard with the necessary confidentiality report still submitted by the District Magistrate to a competent jurisdictional court. In which the accused may be allegedly morally reprehensible, but Article 14 of the Constitution violates their fundamental right to privacy and their other legal rights. Even more dangerous and reprehensible was the situation where the FIR was registered against the accused.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Kotli Loharan lawyer