Find a Lawyer

ANDLEEB SHIR BUTT versus NAVEED HUSSAIN

CPC withdrawal and suit adjustment XXIII, CRC Rule Order XXIII, RRL & 3 Independent Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Articles 42 and 44, withdrew appeal before the Supreme Court The quote warrant writ petition was filed by both the applicant / applicant and the participant applicant, a respondent filed before the High Court that if the participant applicant has been promoted to any higher position, he is the respondent No one will file an appeal or petition against the High Court's promotion order on prayer, rejecting the dismissal application stating that The petitioner's counsel did not want to press the petition in view of the petitioner's plea in the High Court, as well as the co-petition that the High Court's decision was the right of the Supreme Court to appeal the petition filed by the respondent before the High Court. Appeal filed by the court was only related to the matter relating to the applicant and not the appellant who was one of the applicants before the High Court Wri did not dismiss the petition filed by the applicant / applicant against the applicant. May be because the participant does not return it on the basis of the petition filed by the applicant A response to the appeal / application may be taken against the applicants because it is not related to the relief sought by the applicant if there is no compromise in this case the fire arrived. The participant was not a party between the applicant and the defendant and the appellant / applicant when, on the basis of the agreement, the court was asked to record the agreement under R3 of XXIII, RC Matter law websites from Sudhnoti lawyer