Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ADALAT versus MUNSHI KHAN

Regular cancellation of allotment allotment of Mirpur Municipal Committee Regulation for Development and Disposal for Plot or State 1985 Regulation 16 plot The legitimate respondent has been in possession of the controversial khoka for the last twenty years, which is regularly listed under his name. Used to pay Municipal corporation respondents had the right to tax the Khokha, but the mayor of the municipal corporation allotted a plot which stated that the khoka was about to be appellant, but this allotment was issued by the Government's General Cancellation Notification Committee. Canceled by what is called the Local Task Committee. Again the allotment of the allotment to the High Court, against the allotment, it was stated that the allotment was invalidating the hearing, according to Regulation 16 of the Mirpur Municipal Committee. Development and Settlement Regulations of 1985 plot. , The quotations could be regularized before June 30, 1981, and it was also imperative that the encroachments had to be proved through public records, but the relevant records did not have any evidence to prove that the appeal. Occasional violations were made in favor or part of the user. The appellant, even in his written statement to the High Court, did not claim that he had made any transgression of the appellant, nor was there any mention of the High Court in the memorandum of appeal in the Superior Court. Detection was invalid Appellant's eligibility was not met. The order approved by the Local Task Committee in Reglin 16 and in favor of the mayor and appellant of the municipal corporation was illegal online advocate from Mohmand lawyer